>Actually, I didn't assert my obvious genius until my second paragraph. Clearly you didn't read thoroughly
>How delightful. It’s not like we don’t have enough of those around already. Oh, don’t get me wrong, etc etc.
Thats called sarcasm you retard
You are not only patronizing, but also an idiot. I wanted to keep civil, but apparently thats not the way you do things.
>1. I did not, in fact, assume that the players would always want to be on the side of good. I used the word character quite often: that's because it applies equally to all characters, including NPCs.
You got me there.
>I assume you want NPCs that make sense and fit with the setting while making logical decisions, yes?
Yes, because it is your job to make them logical within their own minds. Thats your job, dude.
>What in the Hell are you talking about?
>People have always done wicked things for a variety of reasons: greed, ambition, lust, vengeance, insanity, misanthropy, and many more.
If you would care to read, then I am talking about how "wicked" is a fucking awful concept to use as a lead in to describe a character objectively.
>People do horrible things due to ideology. If you sacrifice newborns to your God in the hopes of going to heaven it fits within your morality and ideology, sure, but you're pretty evil.
Wrong. People do things because 1) they will profit or 2) their ideology compels them. Ideologies themselves cannot be wicked or evil, nor can they be objectively good - these are personal opinions.
>I see that you too have a high opinion of yourself, but unlike me you apparently can't take half joking criticism very well.
I know idiots when I see them, and I also know assholes. You happen to be both, and I wanted to make sure everyone else knew that as well.