>>Consider veins, and all the possible variation.
>Trivial. Superficial. Do you seek to mock me, sir?
Veins, trivial? I think not. Dicks with large, prominent are a awesome. I find them incredibly fun to lick. And if you pop a cock ring on one, you get the most amazing bulging veins. This isn't to say that that smooth dicks without prominent veins aren't just as attractive, and for some body types, more desirable.
>None is desirable. In this, there are only good dicks, and sub-optimal dicks whose flaws can be overlooked in the ongoing quest for dick.
This is clearly just your personal preference. I must say, I didn't expect a self claim connoisseur to be so, narrow focuses. Well, I admit that an extreme curve to the dick can make it harder to suck, I find. But I find a nice curve can really make up for it anally.
>>Consider cuts and foreskin lengths.
>Possibly divisive, but to the connoisseur each is equally well-designed, so to speak, and perfectly acceptable.
I will agree with this point, though.
>Minus the basic questions - like does the owner of this dick wash at all and am I racist against this kind of dick - I maintain that most fags have a common image of the ideal dick.
Personally, I have no one image of an ideal dick. I like a wide variety, and would, in a perfect world have a varied selection of people to chose from regularly.
>But you've raised some interesting points and I promise to seek advice on the matter.
And this is, all in all, just my unasked for opinion.