2/3

3/3, and that's it for this time (too much variety and we wouldn't see as much parallel development).

Nothing's resized because set editor makes it easy to do that as you go. Oh, and if anyone doesn't have it yet: http://magicseteditor.sourceforge.net/

Let's see where this goes.

>>8925358

OK, Anonymous, I'll play, since I am bored and don't have to work tomorrow.... here's 1... not sure if it's too overpowered (do I need to up its mana cost, or tone down its abilities?)

someone come up with something for this. blow my mind.

>>8926067
you can't play the first ability unless you have a blue or red creature. it sucks.

the second ability is almost entirely worthless, considering you have to use planeswalker abilities on your own turn and use them only as a sorcery.

easily one of the worst made cards i've ever seen on /tg/

>>8925999

It's very multipurpose. In particular, tapping for mana is generally a green thing. I'd probably kill the third effect.

Pyromancer is also three mana, and doesn't require mana for its tap ability, but the added utility of an unsummon power is more than worth it. In fact, unsummon is probably worth a lot more than direct damage (U and a card gets you unsummon; R and a card gets you 3 damage rather than just 1). You might want to make the second ability cost more.

Personally I'd switch the mana types (making the creatures cost 1RU, so monoblue and monored can't field him, but then making the tap abilities hybrid mana so he's easier to use). Just a thought.

>>8926067
Wording on the first two need re-working.

First ability should be until end of turn. 4 mana to give a red creature +0/+3 and shroud, and a blue creature +3/+0, permanently, is nuts. Add on that it's REPEATABLE, and you're fucking insane. Also with the way it's worded, you can target a Red/Blue creature with both abilities; I'm assuming that was intentional.

Second ability should read "Prevent all damage a source of your choice would deal to you this turn. Draw a card for each damage prevented this way." That allows you to do something like, tag a creature, and they can't use it to damage you, like a Tap: do one damage. With the current wording, you'd prevent it, and then draw cards as the ability is resolving. Also, "a source of your choice" is how most of them are worded, because it doesn't target. It can 'choose' things with Shroud, etc.

Third ability is fine.

>>8926155
Tapping for mana IS usually green, but this is very obviously 'flavored' as a mage weaving red and blue together. It just converts mana, and barring any untap-shenanigans, it can't even use that mana for itself. I think that the ping for R mana should either do 2 to something and 1 to itself, or not cost mana, Also, agree on it being 1UR, or you'd have to keep the mana cost on the ping.

>>8925368

OK, here's my second one... keep in mind, I don't play red all that often...

>>8926219
I'd say skip the reveal.

3R, Exile the top card of your library: Anarchy Dragon deals X damage to each other creature and each player, where X is equal to the exiled card's converted mana cost.

>>8926131
You're a dick, but thanks for pointing out the snafu on the second ability.

>>8926156
You're right about the first ability, fixed. Also loosened wording on the second.
.

>>8926067
Remember those Red/Blue tribal creatues? Riverfall Mimic and Noggle Bandit? This would be the ideal planeswalker for that deck.

>>8926271
You might want to change it to "Target creature gains +3/+0 and first strike until end of turn if it is blue. Target creature gains +0/+3 until end of turn if it is red."

That way you can activate it as long as there's a creature on the board, regardless of color, if you wanna get the points up. As it is, there has to be a red and a blue, or a blue/red.

Second ability, change the wording to "Until the beginning of your next upkeep, prevent all damage a source of your choice would deal to you. At the beginning of your next upkeep, draw cards equal to the damage prevented this way", or something.

>>8925405
Made it like this because it looks like the images used to look.

>>8926271

Thats the most broken thing I've ever seen.

>>8926323
It was my intent that you need both creatures on the field to use the first ability (note that it gives some blueness to a red creature and some redness to a blue creature). It's easy to foil, which is why his second ability ("go ahead, hit me") is also a loyalty gain.

As for the third, that's actually an excellent idea to diminish the impact of 'skip upkeep' shenanigans.

Question: If an ability prevents damage to you, that also prevents damage to your planeswalkers right? Or is the second ability actually useless because they can just wack Gerom instead of you?

>>8926391
>>8926131

Someone thinks its broken and someone thinks its worthless. Clearly, I'm doing something right.

>>8926046
Here you go.

Pity, I wanted the Dragon, but someone else already got to it.

>>8926327
Does not english well

if they have a forest then they get +0+1 for each forest?

what if they don't have a forest?

Might as well just say they get +0+1 for each forest they control. Since there is no ELSE for the IF

>>8926461
You can get rid of "effect" in the last bit there, just saying "When Clockwork Behemoth leaves the battlefield, return all permanents exiled by Clockwork Behemoth to the battlefield."

>>8926474
It's a global enchantment, which affects ALL CREATURES that ANY player who has even ONE FOREST controls.

Emphasis for clarity, not to be mean.

>>8926517
What if there's a second card being used on him, or what if its interpreted to mean "Return creatures destroyed by him" too?

>>8926327
"All creatures gain +0/+1 for each forest their controller controls."

Really awkward wording, but it works. I think.

>>8926406
I'm not 100% sure. Whenever non-combat damage would be dealt to you by a source your opponent controls, your opponent may elect to have that damage be dealt to any planeswalker you control, instead. I think it's a misdirection effect, but I'm not sure if you can layer it so that the "Prevent damage" thing is on the bottom of the stack, and their re-direct goes first, or not. I'd have to look. Combat damage, though, would do shit. Combat damage is assigned to the target it attacked; when the creature attacks, they declare if they're attacking you, or any planeswalker you control.

Also, if you want that ability to require 2 creatures on the field, it should be "Target creature gets X if red, and another target creature gets Y if blue".

>>8926461

You should do it. The whole point is to see what different places we can arrive at from the same starting point.

>>8926568
Because it won't exile them by doing damage, and the "when CARDNAME leaves the battlefield, return all permanents exiled by CARDNAME to the battlefield" clause is part of the exiling effect, not a seperate line.

I'd word it "2, tap, remove a counter: Exile target permanent. When CARDNAME leaves the battlefield, return all creatures exiled by CARDNAME to the battlefield."

>>8926046
oh fuck yeah

>>8926631
Defender

When you cast CARDNAME, you may draw up to 4 cards. For each card drawn this way, skip your next draw phase.

CARDNAME gets +1/+1 for each card in your hand.

At the beginning of your upkeep, if you have 5 or more cards in hand, CARDNAME loses Defender until end of turn.

>>8926673
Hurp

>>8926569
Chalk it up to the old card style then. That'd be fine, right?

Here's my attempt at the Dragon. Gave up halfway through. BTW, I love >>8926219 's version.

>>8926743
periods on the ends.

>>8926630
Better?

>>8926743
I'm not criticizing these, I'm just trying to work out the wording.

Part of it is a fun thing for me, so I can see if I remember how they SHOULD be worded.

>>8926767
Haha, weird. You've got it as an Elder Dragon, but you have it costed as the Planescape dragons. Same effect.

CARDNAME
Legendary Creature - Elder Dragon

Whenever CARDNAME deals combat damage to a player, you may pay 2B. If you do, destroy target permanent that player considers important

:D

>>8926818
It'd be "return all permanents exiled by CARDNAME to the battlefield", but yes.

>>8926863
Haha no worries, I was saying hurp at myself because I forgot how basic MTG language went.

>>8926863
Oops, that must be the good old Planescape borders acting up on me again. :D
But honestly, can you really call it an Elder Dragon without the Legend at the end? It goes against the spirit of things.

>>8926872
Say what you want about all the changes they made for M10, but Exile is DAMN convenient to use.

And now for something completely different!
Land or enchantment only, use the old borders and language.

Nyo-ho-ho.

>>8927015
And here's a picture of Azathoth for you to -50 SAN at.

Again, old style please.

>>8926973
All clockwork creatures start as 0/0 but with "***** enters the battlefield with (number) +1/+1 counters on it."
Clockwork creatures also lose a +1/+1 counter whenever they attack or block at the end of combat.

>>8926940
Dohohohoho.

>>8927094
AAAAAGHHHHH! IT BUUUUUURNSSSSSS!

>>8927091
Except that one, obviously.

Let the man have his clockwork monstrosity. It's only half-clock, anyway.

>>8927091
('______' )
DAMN YOU, MAKING ME ADD MORE TO WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A FINISHED CARD.

>>8927153

Awesome idea for a card. 12 mana is a bit too much, though. I'd make it 8 or 9 at most.

>>8927194
I only just noticed the 13 on the clock's face.

;_;
WHY DOES EVERYTHING MAKE ME DO ITS WILL?

Also, yeah, now that its P/T has been converted to counters, it should cost a lot less.

I’m not gonna lie, I love the image of the rest of your allies getting all pumped up as more and more satyr girls enter the battlefield.

Woops! Screwed the name up.

>>8927318
You need to capitalize Creature types in the text, and type in CARDNAME instead of manually putting in the name. The two names are different.

>>8927348

Ah, that's why people always type out 'cardname'!

The more you know.

>>8927318
>>8927344
Satyr can't be female.

>>8927371
1.) There isn't a "faun" type
2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyress
3.) Extending a mythological creature into a fantasy race almost always entails creating members of both genders (see: female minotaur, male medusa, etc).

>>8927256

Heh, I kind of dig this.

That said, starting at 6/6 for 8 mana seems a little weak, especially considering that it 'winds down' over time (whether you're attacking with it or exiling with it). On the other hand, I'm probably underestimating the value of the exile effect. 7 mana perhaps?

>>8927461

Interesting. Heavy lifegain sorceries strike me as white, but green does life too and the creature/land-focus probably makes it appropriate.

>>8927511
That is an actual magic card.

>>8927461

To be fair, those are elves being satyry.

>>8927511
green actually did mass life gain first, if memory serves me right. white was on damage prevention.

>>8925999
>>8926155
>>8926183

Herp, sorry, I just now noticed that the third ability costs hybrid and is thus a mana fix. That makes sense.

It would be cool if a creature like this let you play blue mana as red mana for one turn (for instance, to dump everything into a molten ravager). But for playing spells one mana is probably all the fix you'll need.

moar plox

There I did half the work for you. Now WOW me.

rolled 7, 8, 11 = 26

>>8927704
That is terrible design.

>>8927715
something something bushido

w/b

rolled 19, 15, 12 = 46

>>8927763
Not everything needs to be multicolored.

>>8927775
check out the art bro

>>8927699
Skipping your upkeep is really, really useful.

Shroud in a win-condition card might be a bad idea. Cards with a mana cost of more than 10 might as well not have mana costs; it's just going to get cheated in.

I do love the concept. This is my favorite clockfrog so far.

>>8926631
Fucking awesome. I want them to print this.

rolled 19, 11, 11 = 41

>>8927833
No

>>8927814
it usually is useful, you're right

but at most skipping your upkeep will net you neutral on the vanishing, and you'll have a 5/8 shroud "skip your draw step" for 13

shroud is so you can't bugger up the counters, the win condition is there because its what came to mind

13 because there's 13 on the face, same as the win-con, same with the 5/8, that's where the hands appear to be

>>8927833
Okay, Okay I'll accept that. How bout this?

>>8927094
This card, with this art and flavortext, is one of the most badass things in Magic

>>8927833
>6 mana
>16 damage

NO.

>>8927868
err, upkeep that is

idly has anyone else ever tried to do gold colorshifted cards? the card bg is dubloons

>>8927848
>>8927886
Oh ho yes.

And hell with it, this too.

rolled 23 = 23

>>8927912
Vrock-wing mask 2B

Artifact: Equipment

Equip: Lose two life.

Equipped creature gets +2/+0 and fear.

Tap equipped creature and two other creatures equipped with Vrock-wing mask: Destroy target creature and gain two life.

fuck getting Set Editor this late at night.

rolled 61 = 61

>>8927958
maybe 1bb or 3b idk it's been a long time since I played.

>>8927912

rolled 18, 2, 20 = 40

>>8927995
No

I can't wait for the guy to release the colorless frame

>>8928005
>>8927995

Call me crazy but I think this might be balanced at 4.

>>8927848
>>8928005

Cool constructive criticism, tripfag.

>>8928026

It's balanced in relation to pic related. I don;t play T2, so idk how this compares to current discard, but then this isn't a T2 card so...

>>8927995
Probably fair, but should be monoblack

rolled 14, 10, 9 = 33

>>8928053
Didn't you hear? Hymn to Torach is way overpowered.

>>8928074
But Nightmare Fuel is far weaker. Compare to Persecute.

>>8928077

But NF can take lands or creatures, and sometimes it will take a whole hand.

>>8928053

>>Comparable in power to Hymn to Tourach

>>Therefore balanced

>>8928074

Pff, the Hymn is nothing special. I pack 4 in my SuiBlack, but I'm thinking of dropping them for the one-drop that lets you pick the card they pitch.

etc

>>8928097

It's all relative bro. Compared to the crazy shit in this thread, Hymn is weaksauce.

rolled 11, 17, 15 = 43

>>8928077
Persecute isn't a preemptive land destruction spell and possibly more for three mana.

>>8928091
Persecute is far, far more likely to take out someone's whole hand than this is. As for lands, by the third turn you're unlikely to take out more than one land anyway, which is fair for 3 mana.

Worth noting that it's broken with Dark Ritual, but then again formats with Dark Ritual also have moxes.

>>8928122
>Play Nightmare Fuel on turn 3
>Hope to hit one land, often miss entirely
>Almost never hit 2

>Play Coercion on turn 3
>Always hit a land if they have one, and something else if they don't

>>8927699
I thought about it, and I realized you could skip your upkeep and not have the vanishing ability trigger

hurrdurr. I fixed it, as well as rearranging the types

>>8928144

Dark Ritual is actually why I made it blue-black and not mono black.

how lame

>>8927995
Needs "Other than land" to be remotely balanced.

The ability is sorta blue, but the trigger cost is very black.

What can you make with this image, /tg/?

>>8928263
Can you post the art you used for the card?

>>8928263

>>8928354
Yeah, I know. Which is why I said the ability was kinda blue. However, my version lets you choose, which is why it requires creature sac.

>>8928342

Used this: >>8927912

Kind of generic-red, but eh.

Can someone explain the whole "snow" thing to me? Why the hell is it important enough to get its own mana type?

And, for that matter, its own land type (when even green/blue/etc lands aren't really green/blue/etc)?

>>8927755

Kind of like this actually. I feel like it would be a lot more useful with haste.

>>8928438
It was part of a special set where the world was in some sort of Ice Age, so there were "snow-covered" lands or something

>>8928319
Here you go
I only just realized there's a second meaning in the flavor text, haha

>>8928438

Fuck you, I love snow.

>>8928588

>Implying moot is champion of anything other than faggotry

>>8927015
Doing this art because it got skipped. Minus the silliness about the archaic borders/templating because they hurt my eyes.

>>8928491
Epic failure.

>>8927461
I like this, and it has awesome flavor-text. One internet for you.

>>8928620
I think he looks absofuckinlutely fabulous.

>>8928680
That's a real card.

>>8928319

>>8928408
Not sure what to make of this.

>>8928453
Love the flavor text. Like that it's a glass canon with first strike (very red and very appropriate). But please stop giving proper names to non-legendary cards.

>>8928483
Not bad. I wonder how the image inspired those mechanics for you (other than that it's a general black badass, which I guess I can see).

>>8928698

I kind of like the flavor of this card, but it somehow gives me more of a red vibe. Redirection effect reminds me of shunt and torchling.

>>8928772

It was black when I first wrote it. Which is why it's probably overcosted for green.

I think that red redirects are all about causing havoc (i.e, changing an effect from your card to theirs or vice-versa).

>>8928765
>>8928483

I knew I wanted to give it frenzy
but then a 1/2 frenzy for 1B was too boring
but yeah its all about the artwork

I love how most of the guy-in-mask cards are reckless or offense-minded badasses. I can see why when I think about it; bare-armed dude, big sword, spiky mask.

This is the kind of thing I wanted to see when I made the thread.

>>8928860
>socialexperiment.jpeg

Good, good... How about THIS image, /tg/?

>>8928905
imagination.jpg

>>8928950
clearly double strike

I dunno what else

>>8928950

>>8928950

>>8928988
you should make him jund colors, or else make him jund hackblade style hybrid

>>8928319

Because limited fodder needs love too.

>>8929074
Woa! Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, but a targetable pump effect at +1/+2 per mana looks like a pretty big deal, even for white.

Still wrapping my head around the first effect. At first it seemed like a "valiance in the face of defeat/impotence" effect, which was cool, but then I thought about how it would have him just standing idle in cases where you might want to multi-block with him, or where you might be able to finish someone off with a bolt. Which would be the opposite of valiance-in-the-face-of-defeat.

>>8929074
The wording on this card makes no sense, in that you haven't said which value of the opposing creature is supposed to be equal.

>>8929161
I like the effect. But that's a really good, defensive instant buff. Red sucks at instant buffs, and it also sucks at defense.

But hey, as a red player, if this were printed I certainly wouldn't complain.

>>8929202
The first ability is a drawback, that's why he is entitled to the second. It pumps your other creatures, and can also be used to make enemy creatures exactly big enough for Grashin to kill.

The card has a lot of interaction and decision making, and it only has two fairly simple abilities.

I really like the two-sword-guy cards. It seems like more variance this time, but a common theme of down-and-dirty combat.

Now, how about this one?

>>8929391
Play this ability only once each turn.
Second effect should cost tap and do 2 damage.

Hey guys. Just so you know the thread is up on suptg (I think it's been a blast).

Also, let's see what you make of this.

>>8929416
Derp, wrong picture. Meant to post this one

Hope this doesn't split development too far, since like OP said part of the fun is seeing parallel development, but let's see a few takes on this.

>>8929416
That's tough. Set Editor does not like that image's proportions, and there's nothing going on.

>>8929424

Direct damage/lifeloss limited only by mana might be appropriate, but not for a warrior. I feel like that would want to be some kind of heavy-duty deathmage.

>>8929471
0/10

IS THAT MONDAIN THE MOTHERFUCKING WIZARD? WITH THE WORLD GEM?

QUICK, SHATTER SOSARIA

!>>8929458

>>8929501
so this champion thing is basically special summoning in yugioh

>>8929542
0/10

>>8929542
You realize that's a real card, yes? From a real set? Couple years back?

Okay, just checking.

>>8929501
Oh... Didn't realize it was already a card <_<

Well then, how about this?

because reference

>>8928491
+3: Gain control of target creature

4 mana

lololol

>>8929416
>>8929486

Just pretend that it was drawn to fit in the box and that you can fully see how funny he looks.

>>8929501
>>8929598

There's nothing wrong with that. I mean, unless you're familiar with the original card and that colors your perceptions/keeps you from seeing it in an original light.

>>8929245

>>8929598

>>8929458
I'm bad at this.

Overpowered? Underpowered? It's hard for me to judge because land-grabbing is an uncommon effect and because there are so few late-game allies.

>>8929743
not bad, but it seems like an odd choice for black.

>>8929724
retardedly broken.

>>8929726
No you're not. I have no idea if it's balanced, but the "destroy X permanents" plus time counters makes for a really tasty effect. It's the James Bond villain's doomsday plot that you see coming a mile away.

I do know that it should probably be target permanents. And standard wording is "This permanent enters the battlefield with three time counters on it. At the beginning of your upkeep, remove a time counter from it."

>>8929771
I agree with you. How would you alter it?

>>8929416
My attempt at a plainswalker. I was looking to make a Nissa for artifacts.

>>8929791
Forgot my image. DERP

>>8929726
There's no way of keeping track of X on the card. There should be.

And don't use "time," use some other name for the counter.

>>8929771

Mainly thanks to that stupid "Win the game if you have 1 life on your upkeep" card.

>>8929799

Why not time counters? Time counters strike me as the standard way of counting time in magic.

>>8929808
no its mainly due to the fact that it draws you 5 cards for 0 fucking mana. Auto 4-of in every combo deck ever.

>>8929791
>plainswalker
>plains

>>8929764

Is there a better color for stealing lands?

>>8929808
Oh shit, I forgot about that. Wasn't keeping the next set in mind.

Here's a plain image for everyone to fool around with.

>>8929798
>Plainswalker
>PLAINS

>>8929799
What about this?

>>8929783
Haven't played magic since... Urza's set? Was there some set called Urza? Anywho I haven't played in a long time

>>8929484

Can't think of shit for this one.

>>8929791
>>8929798
>>8929831
>>8929848

...This is bad time to be using a tripcode.

>>8929833
blue would generally be that

>>8929863
It's too awkward to control. You want a floating time bomb? Make it so you ADD counters to it, then pay a cost and sacrifice it. Imagine Powder Keg.

Want updates on your Magic? http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Default.aspx
Have fun.

>>8929863

I liked it better (and it was also more balanced) when you paid up front so that they knew exactly what was coming. The other anon is right about having a way to track X, though, and the complication of a second token type probably isn't worth it.

>>8929598

>>8929889
put it down as a multikicker and call them charge counters or something

>>8929916
Lemme lemme

http://magicseteditor.sourceforge.net/

Flesh me out /tg/

>>8929845

>>8929845

Here's my entry for this picture.

>>8929873

I actually couldn't find anything on gatherer that gave you control of a land.

Red and black are the colors for killing land. Black and blue are the colors for tapping enemy land. Blue is the color for bouncing land, and for exchanging lands with an opponent. I could see this as blue too but I don't think there's a presedence yet.

>>8929889
>>8929888
Hmm.

>>8930037
Crap that should be 3 doomsday counters.
Don't drink and type children.

>>8930037
Ugh. That's ugly. Clean it up and make it more concise.

No need to be fancy with your rules. Make it simple.

>>8930037
Too complicated, kind of shitty

MOAR art please.

>>8930033

Theres a black dude in Coldsnap who's cumulative upkeep was stealing land. Can't remember his name though.

>>8930133
that sounds like a pretty good cumulative upkeep right there

>>8930143

>>8930177

add under your control?

>>8930135

Sorry, I forgot how modern that particular image was.

>>8930195

Yes, if a card you control makes a token the token is yours (unless otherwise specified).

This is basically Mind Control, with a second color in its cost, and in return they can't get it back by killing the enchantment.

Alternately you could look at it as rite of replication with removal tacked on and without the kicker (probably a more accurate assesment if you're dealing with indestructable/regenerating creatures).

>>8930069
>>8930061
Okay I give up. Can't be coherant enough to get this card where I want it to be.

>>8930135
Modern, yes, but the art was cool, so I made a full-art card for it.

>>8930177
I had a similar thought
mine is a bit more retarded though

>>8930200

Entry for this picture.

>>8930246

Here man, I tried to clean it up as best I could.

>>8930364

My eyes have been raped; I can't see!

>>8930364
You made it WORSE. If I thought the card had value, I'd clean it up.

If I were more familiar with MtG fluff I might not have to begin/end my card names with made-up proper nouns.

This custom Magic thing is difficult.

>>8930373

Screw you, it's an awesome card idea. It's getting worse because he's making the mistake of doing what everyone tells him to do.

how about this one? There's a chance it'll show up as an actual card in ROE. Either that, or its alternate art for Kazandu Blademaster.

>>8930403

What makes it awesome?

Having a ticking timebomb for RAPE?

already been done, with the golgari guild artifact.

>>8930373

I didn't try to fix the card, I was just trying to clean up the wording. It's still too complex and annoying, but I didn't want to change how it actually worked, just make it easier to read.

I guess I failed.

>>8930364
If x == 0, destroy x things.
That card is goggles.

>>8930414
sauce?

>>8930200

>>8930397
templating is by far the hardest part

the second paragraph should read "If a creature dealt damage by Executor of the Damned would be put into a graveyard, exile it instead."

... I think

Not the original Day of Destruction guy, but tell me what you think about this.

>>8930434
was on the dailymtg site 6 months or so ago

>>8930392

This is neeto, but I feel like white has such good buffs that it's not worth it. Maybe I'm wrong.

>>8930449

Much better. countertech and wording could use some work, but using only one counter type on the card itself is a good idea.

>>8930464
this would be some kind of bizarre limited card that you could use on your own stuff, or on somebody else's

>>8930483

>>8930377

I like this one mucho

though it should either be more expensive of uncommon

>>8930414
Just didn't want to make the W card that I immediately felt like the art wanted.

>>8930501
Whatever program you're using is ugly. Swap to Set Editor

>>8930511
That IS Magic Set Editor. Newest version and everystuff. It's just being damaged right now.
Something about the fonts not wanting to work on sets made with older versions or somesuch.
Pichorro (MSE moderator/templater) expects the users to find and fix it themselves basically so I'm just waiting it out till its recognized as the bug it is and is corrected. (Last bug thread I saw on it was rudely closed by said mod.)

>>8930298

Dangling pronoun. What does "him" refer to?
Nice flavor, and the art is dramatic enough to feel appropriate for a 6/6 brute.

>>8930397
I like the 'kill you for good' power. But why vigilance?

>>8930437
Is intangid a real keyword?

>>8930546
...No. It's not.

>>8930492

You're probably right. I think vampires have skewed my perception of what black creatures are supposed to cost.

>>8930546
You honor me with that question. Thank you.

Nope. Just one of the half dozen or so keywords I have that I WISH were real.

>>8930546

Him is supposed to mean the Butcher of Saints. Fixed it.

>>8930561
Unable to be countered is not something you can equip. If the creature made it into play for you to target equip, then the time to counter it has already passed.
So... shroud and unblockable and double strike. "Put me on a stompy, please don't let the opponent WoG."

>>8930301
Forgot mah planeswalker type line.

>>8930561

>>8930593

We're pretending that we're real designers here using real keywords. So, intangid might have features which don't apply here, but would apply if it were native to a creature.

(Not that I think unblockable/uncounterable/shroud on same creature is a good idea most of the time).

>>8930593
Ah but 'protection from' gives the permanent 'cannot be blocked by' abilities and its certainly not just creatures that can have protection.

>>8930593
>>8930612
Sorry to offend. I just pulled a random almost-acceptable keyword out of my pile. My bad.

>>8930603

Comas make it unclear what 'or' is referring to in the first ability. Also, I'm pretty sure they could just choose to sacrifice zero creatures if all they wanted was a life gain. This appears to be 'choose one of three (generally unattractive) effects', just worded poorly.

Second ability should refer to target creature, not 'any creature of your choice' (unless you just don't think shroud should apply to this and were trying to stumble around it, which is dumb).

The synergy between the +1 and the finisher is neat.

in his ignorance, what hath man wrought?

Tried making an Ally planeswalker.

>>8930612
Then let's use real words. Intangid -> Intangible. We don't have birds with Flya, we don't have green stompies with Tramples, we don't have oozes with Devoureded.

>>8930617
wat

Art must flow.

>>8930647

>>8930603
your busted MSE was bothering me. Sorry.

>>8930636
Good call on the wordieness. Its my weakness.

>>8930646
Suck burn and die grammarnazifag. Adorable words and cut-short statements are part of my style.

>>8930703

But Intangid isn't adorable, it's just fucking stupid.

>>8930696
Actually, Its the silver Un-set border thats the bother, I think. Apologies. It isn't handled well by the MSE. I'll change it for the night.
Right now I'm generating these cards into my Holdovers set (thus the silver border and
big "H") for later dispersal into my several other blocks.

>>8930644

Kind if weak, even by first-gen planeswalker standards. He could start with more loyalty, and the second ability could probably be -2.

>>8930751
Seems way too good. Her second ability is strictly better than a normal bounce.

Found this over in /ic/

>>8930751
>strictly better

I don't think so. But it is probably too cheap.

Also I realized the first ability is bananas because of changelings. Hrm.

>>8930647

>>8930817

edited slightly to reflect earlier post

>>8930787
I was going for an "expensive hooker" motif for this one.

>>8930794
Almost can't make out the purple smoke but oh well.

>>8930878
Forgot image

>>8930787
my Take

>>8930903
error fix

I wish they would make another enemy colored set...

>>8930791
HUZZAH! Now I have a pic for a card I made years ago but could never find a pic for!

Thank you!

>>8930880
one problem, cant really see the pipe

>>8930932

That big guy sure looks colorless to me.

Still very cute.

Whoever Lillor is, she's clearly the opposite of Ula.

>>8930791
This one's really wordy, but I had fun making it.

>>8930787

>>8930969
nice

>>8930969
I've gotten my full share of D'aww for the night. Good show.

>>8931013

>>8930980
in the grim darkness of the post-guildpact, THERE IS ONLY WEDGE COLORS

>>8931070
Actually I kinda love it. Good call.

>>8930969

You just told a story, and furthermore disguised it as something not remotely like a story, in about 60 words.

>>8931075

>>8931081

golgari and selesnya, orzhov and rakdos, azorius and boros, simic and izzet, then dimir and... somebody green for some reason. It doesn't fit entirely, and there's no gruul, but I'm willing to overlook that for how perfect this works out

>>8931075

>>8931153
/r/ you change its name to "The End" and its type to Incarnation

>>8931075

>>8931084
I really wanted to just make her W but that B cost crept in there.

>>8928114
>>8928181
>>8928483
>>8929621
>>8929968
>>8930283
>>8930392
>>8930638
>>8930831
>>8930924
>>8931070
the junk I posted

well gents its been real

we should do this again sometime ...
like, tomorrow

Image limit reached :(

It was fun while it lasted.

>>8931288
>>8931269

Shit yea ladies.

(also, if anyone cares I'm OP, and ended up posting
>>8926271
>>8927344
>>8928415
>>8928698
>>8929159
>>8929650
>>8929743
>>8930177
>>8930377
>>8930967 )

Was fun, but I'm probably done for the night (morning) anyway.

>>8931231
planeswalkers aren't creatures. so you're card's dumb, close to balanced, and full of bad syntax.